Physicists have measured time dilation on the smallest scale ever using an atomic clock made of thousands of ultracold atoms formed into a stack of pancake-shaped blobs
16 February 2022
Physicists have been unable to unite quantum mechanics – a theory that describes matter at the smallest scales – with general relativity, which predicts the behaviour of objects at the largest cosmic scales, including how gravity bends space-time. Because gravity is weak over small distances, it is hard to measure relativity on small scales.
But atomic clocks, which count seconds by measuring the frequency of radiation emitted when electrons around an atom change energy states, can detect these minute gravitational effects.
Join us for a mind-blowing festival of ideas and experiences. New Scientist Live is going hybrid, with a live in-person event in Manchester, UK, that you can also enjoy from the comfort of your own home, from 12 to 14 March 2022. Find out more.
Tobias Bothwell at JILA in Boulder, Colorado, and his colleagues separated hundreds of thousands of strontium atoms into “pancake-shaped” blobs of 30 atoms. They used optical light to trap these into a vertical stack 1 millimetre high. Then they shone a laser on the stack and measured the scattered light with a high-speed camera.
Because the atoms were arranged vertically, Earth’s gravity caused the frequency of oscillations in each group to shift by a different amount, an effect called gravitational redshift. At the top of the clock, a second was measured as 10-19 of a second longer than it was at the bottom. This means if you were to run the clock for the age of the universe – about 14 billion years – it would only be off by 0.1 second, says team member Jun Ye at JILA.
It is this redshift measurement, calculated to a certainty of 21 decimal places, that was predicted by Einstein’s theory. Previous measurements had observed the redshift over larger scales by comparing separate clocks, but the JILA team measured it in a single clock.
“This is the first time where, instead of comparing separate clocks over something like 30 centimetres, we’re now looking within a single clock,” says Bothwell.
One reason for the clock’s precision is because the groups of strontium atoms are close together and share environmental properties, such as their thermal environment, so can be more easily compared and imaged with JILA’s high-resolution camera.
“It’s a very impressive result that they’ve demonstrated. It’s very interesting that, considering different parts of the apparatus, it might give you a different answer [as to the length of a second],” says Patrick Gill at the National Physical Laboratory, UK.
Bothwell says this atomic clock design could eventually be used to measure gravitational waves in space or the possible ways that dark matter couples to matter, as well as having uses in more practical areas, such as improving accuracy for the Global Positioning System (GPS), which uses the precise timing of atomic clocks to calculate distance.
Another research group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has also produced a new atomic clock set-up.
Shimon Kolkowitz and his colleagues used comparisons between six different strontium atomic clocks to measure a second. This comparative model, known as a multiplex clock, means the team can use a less stable laser than the JILA group’s clock, but still achieve a very high level of precision: the clock would lose just 1 second every 300 billion years.
“It’s a nice demonstration that you can use lasers with much lower performance, which are more portable and more robust, and still do these kinds of clock comparisons, with pretty amazing levels of precision,” says Kolkowitz.
His team’s clock measures the relative differences between atomic clocks, so it is well suited to pinning down hard-to-measure effects that propagate through space, such as gravitational waves or dark matter. The group is now looking at measuring gravitational redshift using the multiplex clock on similar scales to the JILA team’s clock.
Journal reference: Nature, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04349-7
Journal reference: Nature, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04344-y